RangeVoting: December 2006 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ]

Starting: Fri Dec 01 04:33:09 GMT 2006
Ending: Sun Dec 31 20:23:43 GMT 2006
Messages: 484

• Re: spamalot
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Clay Published
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• another IRVLetter.html alteration
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: spamalot
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Clay Published
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• reweighted range voting, surplus refund idea
  • From: "Warren Smith" <warren.wds@gmail.com>
• Warren and Richie Cage Match
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] reweighted range voting, surplus refund idea
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Warren and Richie Cage Match
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• SF Chronicle story on NIST / US Election Assistance Commission rept
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• correction to article on NIST rept / URL for the rept
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Warren and Richie Cage Match
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Warren and Richie Cage Match
  • From: "Nathan Larson" <nathanlarson3141@gmail.com>
• Re: Warren and Richie Cage Match
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• duopoly, PR
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Warren and Richie Cage Match
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Rob Richie asks a question (copied from a RR email)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• AP story on alleged election fraud in Bahrain (monitors banned; floaters)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] duopoly, PR
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Rob Richie asks a question (copied from a RR email)
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] duopoly, PR
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Adam Cohen piece in NY Times about voting machines (summary)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• New book by Tideman (repost of James Green-Armytage EM post)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• does phone-banking increase voter turnout? Not nonpartisan appeals.
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Another article says phone banking DOES increase turnout...
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Direct mail effect on voter turnout = nil, other claims re turnout
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• why is Malta 2-party dominated despite STV-PR voting?
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: why is Malta 2-party dominated despite STV-PR voting?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• voting power in US states
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] voting power in US states
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: Juho <juho4880@yahoo.co.uk>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: Juho <juho4880@yahoo.co.uk>
• one fewer IRV country in the world... RIP
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] one fewer IRV country in the world... RIP
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Forest Simmons invents a new lottery-type voting method
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: Juho <juho4880@yahoo.co.uk>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Forest Simmons' "rainbox lottery" voting method
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• parties irrelevan with RRV?
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: Juho <juho4880@yahoo.co.uk>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Forest Simmons' "rainbox lottery" voting method
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] parties irrelevan with RRV?
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: parties irrelevan with RRV?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: parties irrelevan with RRV?
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Brams "preference approval voting" (PrAV)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: duopoly, PR
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: parties irrelevan with RRV?
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: parties irrelevan with RRV?
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: parties irrelevan with RRV?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Weird - Independents do much better than third parties in Australia
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Not so Weird - Independents do much better than third parties in USA too
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: parties irrelevan with RRV?
  • From: Juho <juho4880@yahoo.co.uk>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Not so Weird - Independents do much better than third parties in USA too
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Not so Weird - Independents do much better than third parties in USA too
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: parties irrelevan with RRV?
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• [RangeVoting] Re: parties irrelevan with RRV?
  • From: Juho <juho4880@yahoo.co.uk>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Weird - Independents do much better than third parties in Australia
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Weird - Independents do much better than third parties in Australia
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Weird - Independents do much better than third parties in Australia
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Not so Weird - Independents do much better than third parties in USA too
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Fusion
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: parties irrelevan with RRV?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Fusion
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Fusion
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Fusion
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Fusion
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Fusion
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Weird - Independents do much better than third parties in Australia
  • From: "cbenhamau" <cbenhamau@yahoo.com.au>
• Re: Fusion
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• No paper trail.
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Fusion
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• rv in st. paul
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Fusion
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: Fusion
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Fusion
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Fusion
  • From: Juho <juho4880@yahoo.co.uk>
• Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: "gwolfe" <bogonflux@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Forest Simmons' "rainbow lottery" method (illustrative examples)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Fusion
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• spoilers not a bad thing because of leverage to move major parties?
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• OS interface design lessons
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: spoilers not a bad thing because of leverage to move major parties?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: OS interface design lessons
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• approval public relations
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Simmons' rainbow, a general claim about [again a repost from FS]
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] spoilers not a bad thing because of leverage to move major parties?
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• <deleted message>
  • From: lotonavidad@yahoo.es
• Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Taiwan has close election (probably corruption>margin, etc)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• The Iraq war declaration
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] approval public relations
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: approval public relations
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Ken Thompson's trojan horse compiler-hacking-hacking-hack
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Interesting reading - A Brief Illustrated History of Voting, etc. by Douglas Jones
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: Ken Thompson's trojan horse compiler-hacking-hacking-hack
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• T.N.Tideman's new book: what is the best voting method? SmithSet+IRV?
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Ken Thompson's trojan horse compiler-hacking-hacking-hack
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Ken Thompson's trojan horse compiler-hacking-hacking-hack
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Green-Armytage's cardinal preference system (as described by Tideman)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Ken Thompson's trojan horse compiler-hacking-hacking-hack
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• $90K in your freezer? 1. No crime charge. 2. Get re-elected.
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Yahoo!Answers denizens' views of RV (brutal!)
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Ken Thompson's trojan horse compiler-hacking-hacking-hack
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Ken Thompson's trojan horse compiler-hacking-hacking-hack
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• comforting "security blanket" illusions
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Ken Thompson's trojan horse compiler-hacking-hacking-hack
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Intel run by Klingons!
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Intel run by Klingons!
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] comforting "security blanket" illusions
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: NY Times claims US will change and we will get paper trails
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• THE NATION publishes my letter (for a refreshing change)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Arnold Schwarzennegger vetos National Popular Vote plan
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Katrina van den Heuvel replies to Smith Letter to THE NATION
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Intel run by Klingons!
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Intel run by Klingons!
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Katrina van den Heuvel replies to Smith Letter to THE NATION
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Katrina van den Heuvel replies to Smith Letter to THE NATION
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Katrina van den Heuvel replies to Smith Letter to THE NATION
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Reply to K vd Heuvel
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Uh Clay... about THE NATION
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Katrina van den Heuvel replies to Smith Letter to THE NATION
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Reply to K vd Heuvel
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Katrina van den Heuvel replies to Smith Letter to THE NATION
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Katrina van den Heuvel replies to Smith Letter to THE NATION
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Uh Clay... about THE NATION
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] THE NATION publishes my letter (for a refreshing change)
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Katrina van den Heuvel replies to Smith Letter to THE NATION
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Green-Armytage's cardinal preference system (as described by Tideman)
  • From: "cbenhamau" <chrisjbenham@optusnet.com.au>
• Re: [RangeVoting] THE NATION publishes my letter (for a refreshing change)
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Arnold Schwarzennegger vetos National Popular Vote plan
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Katrina van den Heuvel replies to Smith Letter to THE NATION
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: THE NATION publishes my letter (for a refreshing change)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• THE NATION correspondence
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Ken Thompson's trojan horse compiler-hacking-hacking-hack
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] comforting "security blanket" illusions
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• An IRV election in Alberta (wikinews) / Robinson praises wasted votes
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: optical scan vs manual count
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Cool pictures by Bolson & Ka-Ping Ye
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• USA voting machine picture changes (but not really since all voluntary)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• US statehouses, party composition
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: optical scan vs manual count
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: optical scan vs manual count
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• remove the biased justices? Olympic system solves problem?
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: remove the biased justices? Olympic system solves problem?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• US statehouse & Fed party composition (vs Australia)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] US statehouses, party composition
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: US statehouses, party composition
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Ken Thompson's trojan horse compiler-hacking-hacking-hack
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] USA voting machine picture changes (but not really since all voluntary)
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: optical scan vs manual count
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] comforting "security blanket" illusions
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: US statehouses, party composition
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: US statehouses, party composition
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: US statehouses, party composition
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: US statehouses, party composition
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: US statehouses, party composition
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: US statehouses, party composition
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: US statehouses, party composition
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: US statehouses, party composition
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Heavy(?) fines for several "527" groups
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Heavy(?) fines for several "527" groups
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: optical scan vs manual count
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Cool pictures by Bolson & Ka-Ping Ye
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Cool pictures by Bolson & Ka-Ping Ye
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Cool pictures by Bolson & Ka-Ping Ye
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• krist novoselic
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Cool pictures by Bolson & Ka-Ping Ye
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: krist novoselic
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: krist novoselic
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: US statehouses, party composition
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Cool pictures by Bolson & Ka-Ping Ye
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Heavy(?) fines for several "527" groups
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: US statehouses, party composition
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: Cool pictures by Bolson & Ka-Ping Ye
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Cool pictures by Bolson & Ka-Ping Ye
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: "gwolfe" <bogonflux@gmail.com>
• cool pictures
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: cool pictures
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: cool pictures / theorems about
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: cool pictures
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Fwd: [instantrunoff] New poll: three-fourths of California voters support Citizens Assembly; majorities support IRV and Proportional Votign
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Democratic Reform site
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Scott Ritchie's FAVS criterion - uniquely favors range voting
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• IRV example of FAVS-violation (complete information scenario)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: IRV example of FAVS-violation (complete information scenario)
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Wikipedia HORRIBLY distorting range voting
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: IRV example of FAVS-violation (complete information scenario)
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Free Liberal
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Wikipedia HORRIBLY distorting range voting
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Re: IRV example of FAVS-violation (complete information scenario)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Democratic Reform site
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• voting machine trends
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• How about this partly normalized RV idea?
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: How about this partly normalized RV idea?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Condorcet method was used ?!
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Condorcet method was used ?!
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Selfish selection of voting method
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• No districts = unconstitutional?
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: No districts = unconstitutional?
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• voters "not caring enough" to "insist" on no corruption; a crucial ratio
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Brian Olson on cost of hand-count vs optical-scan machine count
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Selfish selection of voting method
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Selfish selection of voting method
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: how far from best candidate / colored pictures
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: how far from best candidate / colored pictures
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Selfish selection of voting method
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: how far from best candidate / colored pictures
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Ka-Ping Ye's pictures / exciting theorems
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Selfish selection of voting method
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Selfish selection of voting method
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Example of strategic Condorcet voters not electing honest-CW
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Example of strategic Condorcet voters not electing honest-CW
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Selfish selection of voting method
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Selfish selection of voting method
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Putin approved by 80% of Russians?!
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] How about this partly normalized RV idea?
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Wikipedia HORRIBLY distorting range voting
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: At what point does RV violate PR?
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Wikipedia HORRIBLY distorting range voting
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Indonesia, "atomized" multi-partyism
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Free Association and Delegable Proxy concepts - interesting
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Wikipedia HORRIBLY distorting range voting
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian regret for idiots
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Wikipedia HORRIBLY distorting range voting
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Free Association and Delegable Proxy concepts - interesting
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Selfish selection of voting method
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Selfish selection of voting method
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• IRV/Approval hybrid method?
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: IRV/Approval hybrid method?
  • From: "cbenhamau" <chrisjbenham@optusnet.com.au>
• Re: IRV/Approval hybrid method?
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: IRV/Approval hybrid method?
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Free Association and Delegable Proxy concepts - interesting
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Free Association and Delegable Proxy concepts - interesting
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Wikipedia HORRIBLY distorting range voting
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Free Association and Delegable Proxy concepts - interesting
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Free Association and Delegable Proxy concepts - interesting
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Free Association and Delegable Proxy concepts - interesting
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Benham with an attack on range voting [repost by WDS]
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Free Association and Delegable Proxy concepts - interesting
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Nasty anti-range/approval example; cycle walking
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Same example as before (only a bit nastier)
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Free Association and Delegable Proxy concepts - interesting
  • From: "Gned the Gnome" <Gned@PObox.com>
• Updated Wikipedia entry
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Benham with an attack on range voting
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Weird, probably bad, voting method.
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Weird, probably bad, voting method.
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Benham with an attack on range voting / attempted defense via BR
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Updated Wikipedia entry
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• A masters dissertation by Micah Altman
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: A masters dissertation by Micah Altman
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Updated Wikipedia entry
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Free Association and Delegable Proxy concepts - interesting
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Updated Wikipedia entry
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Updated Wikipedia entry
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• other interesting wiki pages
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Warren Smith on Daily Kos
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Some Hands-On Experience with Manual Vote Counting
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Libertarian Reform Caucus adopts range voting
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Unitless Bayesian regret
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: A masters dissertation by Micah Altman
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Warren Smith on Daily Kos
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Unitless Bayesian regret
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Libertarian Reform Caucus adopts range voting
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Warren Smith on Daily Kos
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Libertarian Reform Caucus adopts range voting
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Unitless Bayesian regret
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: A masters dissertation by Micah Altman
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Simpson-Kramer minmax Condorcet method fails FAVS
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Simpson-Kramer minmax Condorcet method fails FAVS
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• The SF 'Hugo award' is selected via IRV
  • From: "gwolfe" <bogonflux@gmail.com>
• Re: [ApprovalVoting] IRV/Approval hybrid method?
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Steven Hill proposes random selection process
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: A masters dissertation by Micah Altman
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: A masters dissertation by Micah Altman
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Email from BlackBoxVoting says we need Freedom of Election Info act
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• free hugs
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: A masters dissertation by Micah Altman
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• earmarks and pork as tools to use your money to keep party X in power
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• CO Voter Choice (neutral)
  • From: jan.kok.5y@gmail.com
• Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: CO Voter Choice (neutral)
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: CO Voter Choice (neutral)
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: CO Voter Choice (neutral)
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: CO Voter Choice (neutral)
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: Juho <juho4880@yahoo.co.uk>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: CO Voter Choice (neutral)
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: CO Voter Choice (neutral)
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: CO Voter Choice (neutral)
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Top Few Names for "Bayesian efficiency"
  • From: "CLAY S" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Invitation to join Colorado Voter Choice group
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• New voting method from Forest Simmons [repost]
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Buying and Selling Votes
  • From: Stephen Unger <unger@cs.columbia.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Luddism from Unger / critique
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Buying and Selling Votes
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Re: Buying and Selling Votes
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: Juho <juho4880@yahoo.co.uk>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: "Jan Kok" <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
• Tideman election data
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Bayesian efficiency
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Tideman criticizes range voting
  • From: Juho <juho4880@yahoo.co.uk>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Buying and Selling Votes
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• LA Times screws it up
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Buying and Selling Votes
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Criticisms of Range Voting web page
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Criticisms of Range Voting web page
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• apportionment, mathematical beauty revealed
  • From: "Warren Smith" <warren.wds@gmail.com>
• <deleted message>
  • From: philips_sandra@yahoo.com
• Re: apportionment, mathematical beauty revealed
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Kathy Dopp, merge, USCountVotes.org
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• F Simmons on "Clone proofing Copeland"
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: apportionment, mathematical beauty revealed
  • From: "Warren Smith" <warren.wds@gmail.com>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: LA Times screws it up
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: "brokenladdercalendar" <thebrokenladder@gmail.com>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Bayesian efficiency
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Juho Laatu on using fake polls to push elections your way
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• NY Times about congressman Murtha = Mr. Pork + sleaze
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• And here's the full Washington Post article on Murtha = sleaze+pork
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Forest Simmons new cloneproof simple Condorcet method
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: Forest Simmons new cloneproof simple Condorcet method
  • From: "raphfrk" <raphfrk@yahoo.ie>
• Re: Forest Simmons new cloneproof simple Condorcet method
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Forest Simmons new cloneproof simple Condorcet method
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
• Re: Forest Simmons new cloneproof simple Condorcet method
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Wait a minute - Simmons' "cloneproof" method is not really cloneproof!
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Weakened sense in which Simmons IS cloneproof
  • From: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
• Re: [RangeVoting] Forest Simmons new cloneproof simple Condorcet method
  • From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>