RangeVoting: October 2005 Archives by date
Messages sorted by:
[ thread ]
Starting:
Sat Oct 01 01:13:03 GMT 2005
Ending:
Mon Oct 31 21:34:02 GMT 2005
Messages:
196
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: RV in the two contender case
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
VotePoll: A few comments on the polls
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] VotePoll: A few comments on the polls
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] VotePoll: A few comments on the polls
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Thomas Smith's Borda/Condorcet controversy example
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
New poll for RangeVoting
From
: RangeVoting@yahoogroups.com
New poll for RangeVoting
From
: RangeVoting@yahoogroups.com
New poll for RangeVoting
From
: RangeVoting@yahoogroups.com
Re: [RangeVoting] VotePoll: A few comments on the polls
From
: Markus Schulze <markus.schulze@alumni.tu-berlin.de>
"score voting"? (Forward from Ron Rivest)
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Markus: I don't want to exclude you. I asked if you advocate RV.
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] "score voting"? (Forward from Ron Rivest)
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
Re: VotePoll: Poll comments
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Binary number voting?
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
VotePoll: Posting of the votes from the results display
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
I should add nominated alternative(s) to ballot the day after announcing them.
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: "score voting"? (Forward from Ron Rivest)
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
0-9 vs 0-10, 0-99 vs 0-100, etc.
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
I agree that crumbs make finely-graded RV better
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Approval vs finer-graded RV
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
several recent issues
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
comparison: 0-10/0-100 versus 0-9/0-99 (& why I favor latter system & +only)
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
starting at 0 is better than starting at 1
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Method merit comments. Contradictions explained.
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
VotePoll: Any opinions on best way to deal with new nominations?
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: VotePoll: Any opinions on best way to deal with new nominations?
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Afghan elections fraudulent
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
A model of voter behavior esp. voting sincerity; effect on voting method choice
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
Recommended optional feature for RV
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
Range Ballot creator
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: Recommended optional feature for RV
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Iraq vote manipulation, latest twist in their "democracy"
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] Iraq vote manipulation, latest twist in their "democracy"
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
VotePoll: Re: Any opinions on how to deal with new nominations?
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
New poll for RangeVoting
From
: RangeVoting@yahoogroups.com
VotePoll: I've posted a new-nominations ballot at the Polls page
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
VotePoll: Ballot note
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: starting at 0 is better than starting at 1
From
: "cbenhamau" <cbenhamau@yahoo.com.au>
Re: starting at 0 is better than starting at 1 / two ranges in same election?
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
RV26
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Jan nominated the fine-at-extremes RV
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
RV ranges
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: starting at 0 is better than starting at 1 / two ranges in same election?
From
: "cbenhamau" <cbenhamau@yahoo.com.au>
Re: starting at 0 is better than starting at 1 / two ranges in same election?
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: starting at 0 is better than starting at 1 / two ranges in same election?
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
magazines
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
New poll for RangeVoting
From
: RangeVoting@yahoogroups.com
I've added two new nominations to Poll page
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] RV ranges
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
Re: Ranges for RV
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
CA prop 77 and gerrymandering
From
: "gwolfe" <bogodynamics@yahoo.com>
Re: [ApprovalVoting] Re: Approval voting inventor Guy Ottewell endorses Range Voting
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: [ApprovalVoting] Re: Approval voting inventor Guy Ottewell endorses Range Voting
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: CA prop 77 and gerrymandering
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: starting at 0 is better than starting at 1 / two ranges in same election?
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
correction of misconception about primaries
From
: "Warren D. Smith" <WDSmith@fastmail.fm>
OpenDebates.org
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
List announcement of earlier poll has posted
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
VotePoll: The poll results-displays are now all accurate.
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: starting at 0 is better than starting at 1 / two ranges in same election?
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: starting at 0 is better than starting at 1 / two ranges in same election?
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: starting at 0 is better than starting at 1 / two ranges in same election?
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Endorsement from Socialist Party presidential candidate Walter Brown
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] Endorsement from Socialist Party presidential candidate Walter Brown
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Comments on Lomax's RV statements
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: Comments on Lomax's RV statements
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
New poll for RangeVoting
From
: RangeVoting@yahoogroups.com
New poll for RangeVoting
From
: RangeVoting@yahoogroups.com
PageDesign & NamePoll
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] PageDesign & NamePoll
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] OpenDebates.org
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Comments on Lomax's RV statements
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
The libertarian & green & constitution (& etc) party platforms on voting
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: OpenDebates.org
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: PageDesign & NamePoll
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: PageDesign & NamePoll
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: PageDesign & NamePoll
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
HomePage designs
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: PageDesign & NamePoll
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: PageDesign & NamePoll
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
write short magazine article about range voting and CRV efforts/plans?
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
discard outliers?
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
About Iowa Caucuses (forward from Prof. Doug Jones, U.Iowa CS dept)
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Jones on Iowa - wds reply
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: Jones on Iowa - wds reply
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
<deleted message>
From
: nkklrp@hotmail.com
Jones says more on Iowa. We do not have much time!
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
furious reply to Jones re Iowa & plans
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
more from Jones re Iowa
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] discard outliers?
From
: Anthony Duff <anthony_duff@yahoo.com.au>
Re: discard outliers?
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] About Iowa Caucuses (forward from Prof. Doug Jones, U.Iowa CS dept)
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] furious reply to Jones re Iowa & plans
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: About Iowa Caucuses / More info from Jones / Reply Lomax
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
caucus gimmick
From
: wds@math.temple.edu
Re: [RangeVoting] more from Jones re Iowa
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] discard outliers?
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
more from Jones... responding to WDS & Lomax
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: more from Jones... responding to WDS & Lomax / response by wds
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: About Iowa Caucuses / More info from Jones / Reply Lomax
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: About Iowa Caucuses / More info from Jones / Reply Lomax
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: more from Jones... responding to WDS & Lomax / response by wds
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: discard outliers?
From
: Anthony Duff <anthony_duff@yahoo.com.au>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: more from Jones... responding to WDS & Lomax / response by wds
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: About Iowa Caucuses / More info from Jones / Reply Lomax
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] caucus gimmick
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: Another error made by Lomax
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
refutations of some false statements about IRV
From
: wds@math.temple.edu
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Another error made by Lomax
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Stephen Shalom on range voting
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Condorcet voting methods suffer "favorite betrayal"
From
: wds@math.temple.edu
Venzke's proof says something even stronger
From
: wds@math.temple.edu
RE: Venzke's proof says something even stronger
From
: Kevin Venzke <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Re: Venzke's proof says something even stronger
From
: wds@math.temple.edu
Re: [RangeVoting] Condorcet voting methods suffer "favorite betrayal"
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Condorcet voting methods suffer "favorite betrayal"
From
: wds@math.temple.edu
Lomax's objection to the FBC demonstration
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] Condorcet voting methods suffer "favorite betrayal"
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
RE: Condorcet voting methods suffer "favorite betrayal"
From
: Kevin Venzke <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Venzke's proof says something even stronger
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: Venzke's proof says something even stronger
From
: "stepjak" <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Re: Venzke's proof
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Venzke's proof says something even stronger
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Venzke's proof
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: corrections to & comments re Lomax's attempted FBC proof
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Venzke proof rewritten
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Why CC is incompatible with FBC. Comments on Lomax's posting.
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Addendum to CC FBC demonstration
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Venzke proof (CC incompatible with FBC) is flawed.
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] Venzke proof rewritten
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] Venzke proof rewritten
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: Venzke proof (CC incompatible with FBC) is flawed. More flawed.
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Venzke proof (CC incompatible with FBC) is flawed. More flawed.
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: Venzke proof (CC incompatible with FBC) is flawed. More flawed.
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: Venzke proof (CC incompatible with FBC) is flawed.
From
: "stepjak" <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Re: Venzke proof (CC incompatible with FBC) is flawed.
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Still flawed with typo fixed
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: Still flawed with typo fixed
From
: "stepjak" <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Re: Still flawed with typo fixed
From
: "stepjak" <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Expanding the proof
From
: "stepjak" <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Venzke defends proof
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
New Venzke proof...
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
trivially simple Venzke-like proof Condorcet ==> Favorite Betrayal
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: Venzke defends proof
From
: "stepjak" <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Re: Venzke defends proof (clarification)
From
: "stepjak" <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Re: Venzke defends proof / more nerding
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Frequency of Condorcet Winner?
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
Re: Venzke defends proof / more nerding
From
: "stepjak" <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Re: Frequency of Condorcet Winner?
From
: "stepjak" <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Re: Frequency of Condorcet Winner?
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: Venzke defends proof / more nerding
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: Frequency of Condorcet Winner? Correction of error by WDS re Myers
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
CVD essay about Carter-Baker voting report (fwd from Chris Benham)
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: Venzke defends proof / more nerding
From
: "stepjak" <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Re: Venzke defends proof / more nerding
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
By their kind of preference, Approval & RV match Condorcet
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
I told why CC is incompatible with FBC. Why the continuing debate?
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: Venzke defends proof / more nerding
From
: "stepjak" <stepjak@yahoo.fr>
Re: [RangeVoting] CVD essay about Carter-Baker voting report (fwd from Chris Benham)
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Tideman book chapters in files area
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
NY Times editorial on voter-ID used as poll tax to exclude poorer voters
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
US voting machines / another fine muddle
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] NY Times editorial on voter-ID used as poll tax to exclude poorer voters
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Venzke defends proof / more nerding
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
range voting sincerity vs strategy / examples (jjfaran & WDS)
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
socialists
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
More funny RV+strategy examples inspired by Faran's
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
reply to Faran & Ossipoff re range's deficiencies
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] socialists
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
How to make new friends
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
socialists & report from their convention
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] socialists & report from their convention
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
Re: socialists & report from their convention
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
more re socialists
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: socialists & report from their convention
From
: Abd ulRahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
World Problems & how range voting would affect them
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
declared strategy voting / Sarvo-range voting
From
: wds@math.temple.edu
We should talk about average scores, not total scores
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
socialist failure
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
range voting example by Boris Alexeev
From
: wds@math.temple.edu
Example where non-approval-style range voting really IS strategically optimal
From
: wds@math.temple.edu
Re: [RangeVoting] socialist failure
From
: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax <abd@lomaxdesign.com>
survey of multiwinner voting systems (preliminary)
From
: wds@math.temple.edu
Jan--Averaging vs summing
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Alexeev's claim that Approval strategy isn't optimal in RV
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Alexeev's and wds's claims are true. But they only use 3 voters.
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
averaging versus totalling
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
My 2000 theory of RV strategy
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Continuation & correction of previous post on my 2000 theory of RV strategy
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
That can be demonstrated much more clearly
From
: "MIKE OSSIPOFF" <nkklrp@hotmail.com>
Re: Jan--Averaging vs summing
From
: "cbenhamau" <cbenhamau@yahoo.com.au>
strategic dishonesty in range voting - does it mater in reality?
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
more on strategic dishonesty in RV
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: [RangeVoting] Re: Jan--Averaging vs summing
From
: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@gmail.com>
outlier discarding as in the Olympics
From
: "warren_d_smith31" <wds@math.temple.edu>
Re: strategic dishonesty in range voting - does it mater in reality?
From
: "Rob LeGrand" <rob@approvalvoting.org>
Mail converted by
MHonArc