a victory and not (yet) a victory
Cvderic Cvderic at aol.com
Mon, 19 Mar 2001 18:00:17 EST
An update on instant runoff voting and electoral reform in Maryland:
First, the bad news. Sen. Paul Pinsky's bill, SB 233, to implement instant
runoff voting for most federal and state elections in the state, did not pass
out of the Senate Economic and Environmental Affairs Committee (basically, we
can only improve in future years). Let's just say that this was an
educational year and we will come back with renewed vigor and determination
next year. And more importantly, when the General Assembly is out of
session, let's target key legislators, meet with them and prime them for
reintroduction of the bill next year. After all, it's rare when a bill gets
much attention in its first year of introduction and these reforms take time
to build.
For anyone who was writing their legislator about SB 233, please do not stop
simply because the bill didn't pass out of committee. Legislators still need
to hear from us.
Second, the good news is that the recommendations of the Special Committee on
Voting Systems and Elections Procedures in Maryland has become public.
See: http://sos.state.md.us/
This was the committee chaired by Secretary of State John Willis, which was
charged with recommending improvements to voting technology for the state.
(It wasn't charged with voting SYSTEM reforms, but voting machines and the
like...). Nonetheless, one of the most important things for our cause is to
ensure that new voting machines will be compatible with ranked choice ballots
so instant runoff voting and forms of proportional representation will be
possible in the future. Without the capacity for voting machines to handle
ranked ballots, we would be closed out of these reforms for years to come.
In the report, which I have looked at but not digested yet, they recommend
voting machines that can be made compatible with ranked ballots with the
proper software -- direct recording electronic machines for polling places
and optical scanners for absentee voting. We STILL need to ensure that if
and when Maryland puts out a Request for Proposals (RFP) to voting machine
vendors that the RFP requires the machines and software to handle ranked
ballots without any future cost.
The report does recognize instant runoff voting, when the committee wrote: "a
major advantage of a Direct Recording Electronic voting system is its ability
to handle specific needs of the voting population and be adaptable to future
needs and expressions of the voters." This includes a footnote referencing
the Center for Voting and Democracy's and the Maryland Green Party's
testimony about instant runoff voting. The report explains how instant
runoff voting works and correctly notes that it was used at one time in
Maryland primary elections. There may be more references to ranked voting
systems, but I have not come across them as of yet.
Our job in the coming months will be to ensure that the RFP includes ranked
choice voting software.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Eric
cvderic@aol.com
301-270-4616